<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Photo Fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnamon.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnamon.com</link>
	<description>Articles and Reviews for Fun Photography by John Amon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera by john</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/how-to-copy-35mm-film-with-dslr-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=239#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Smaller apertures such as F22 allow for sharp photos on small format cameras such as 35mm or DX format. 

The F22 allows for enough DOF to capture the natural bends and curves of the films in sharp focus. The zoom of your lens, distance from subject  and film flatness will determine your required aperture to achieve sharp results. 

Good luck and have fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smaller apertures such as F22 allow for sharp photos on small format cameras such as 35mm or DX format. </p>
<p>The F22 allows for enough DOF to capture the natural bends and curves of the films in sharp focus. The zoom of your lens, distance from subject  and film flatness will determine your required aperture to achieve sharp results. </p>
<p>Good luck and have fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera by Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/how-to-copy-35mm-film-with-dslr-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=239#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Why F22 or smaller? I always thought that the best resolution could be obtained before F11 to minimize diffraction. Specially taking into account that the film is all on the same plane, I would expect F8 to be aprox ideal. Care to comment? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why F22 or smaller? I always thought that the best resolution could be obtained before F11 to minimize diffraction. Specially taking into account that the film is all on the same plane, I would expect F8 to be aprox ideal. Care to comment? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invert Colour Negatives In Lightroom by ollin</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/invert-colour-negative-in-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>ollin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=271#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Hey, i know it&#039;s an old article but i had to let you know how much your tutorial helped me, now i&#039;m in love with film! Here&#039;s an image i achieved using you method + tweaking the &quot;camera callibration&quot; section. 59. http://flic.kr/p/awqBhp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i know it&#8217;s an old article but i had to let you know how much your tutorial helped me, now i&#8217;m in love with film! Here&#8217;s an image i achieved using you method + tweaking the &#8220;camera callibration&#8221; section. 59. <a href="http://flic.kr/p/awqBhp" rel="nofollow">http://flic.kr/p/awqBhp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon FM3a Detailed Review by Christopher Deere</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/10/nikon-fm3a-detailed-review/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Deere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 07:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=407#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Dear John,

                    (Pardon me while I chortle for a moment at the thought of starting a letter by writing &#039;Dear John&#039;.) Hello from grey and wet Melbourne, in Australia: the rain is falling, the fire is warming; and in the empty minutes before I try to make my dinner I have found your post about the Nikon FM3a, and now I feel the need to say a few words. I have owned this camera for seven years; I have also owned an FM2 (a Dragon Series model) for nine years and a near-mint-condition second-hand FA for about four months. I believe that the 3a is quite possibly the best 35mm camera ever made for anyone who is truly serious about film photography (certainly, the best SLR camera), and about the art and craft of making photographs that are intended to last for hundreds of years. I do sometimes feel an urge towards the purchase of a Leica MP; quite apart from the cost, however, my reason for not doing so is the fact that a circular polariser cannot be sensibly used on a rangefinder camera. Australia is blessed with a lot of hard light, so a polarising filter is a necessity. Leaving that little point aside, however, the underlying reality is that the 3a is a genuinely brilliant camera that will only become more valuable and more highly-regarded as time goes by. In the right hands - that old obvious phrase - and with the best eye (and heart, and head) the 3a can produce an image as great and timeless as any other from the long history of photography - and my personal and professional leaning is towards documentary photography, which in my opinion is exactly what a serious camera is for. So, I do hope that you will use yours to make good pictures for a long time to come. (I hope the same for myself.)
   Cast your eye over my creaky Flickr site to see some of my images (not all of which were made with the 3a, as for a long time my main body was a Minolta 9000), and find and read &#039;The Ongoing Moment&#039; by Geoff Dyer if you have not already done so.
   For the moment, dear John,


          With my regards,

                                         Christopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear John,</p>
<p>                    (Pardon me while I chortle for a moment at the thought of starting a letter by writing &#8216;Dear John&#8217;.) Hello from grey and wet Melbourne, in Australia: the rain is falling, the fire is warming; and in the empty minutes before I try to make my dinner I have found your post about the Nikon FM3a, and now I feel the need to say a few words. I have owned this camera for seven years; I have also owned an FM2 (a Dragon Series model) for nine years and a near-mint-condition second-hand FA for about four months. I believe that the 3a is quite possibly the best 35mm camera ever made for anyone who is truly serious about film photography (certainly, the best SLR camera), and about the art and craft of making photographs that are intended to last for hundreds of years. I do sometimes feel an urge towards the purchase of a Leica MP; quite apart from the cost, however, my reason for not doing so is the fact that a circular polariser cannot be sensibly used on a rangefinder camera. Australia is blessed with a lot of hard light, so a polarising filter is a necessity. Leaving that little point aside, however, the underlying reality is that the 3a is a genuinely brilliant camera that will only become more valuable and more highly-regarded as time goes by. In the right hands &#8211; that old obvious phrase &#8211; and with the best eye (and heart, and head) the 3a can produce an image as great and timeless as any other from the long history of photography &#8211; and my personal and professional leaning is towards documentary photography, which in my opinion is exactly what a serious camera is for. So, I do hope that you will use yours to make good pictures for a long time to come. (I hope the same for myself.)<br />
   Cast your eye over my creaky Flickr site to see some of my images (not all of which were made with the 3a, as for a long time my main body was a Minolta 9000), and find and read &#8216;The Ongoing Moment&#8217; by Geoff Dyer if you have not already done so.<br />
   For the moment, dear John,</p>
<p>          With my regards,</p>
<p>                                         Christopher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nikon FM3a Detailed Review by nikon d4000</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/10/nikon-fm3a-detailed-review/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>nikon d4000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 07:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=407#comment-198</guid>
		<description>What ever happened with the 35 prime and 85 replacements? We don’t need more cameras we need good lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What ever happened with the 35 prime and 85 replacements? We don’t need more cameras we need good lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera by Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/how-to-copy-35mm-film-with-dslr-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 02:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=239#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Hi John, thanks a lot for your prompt response!
I did a great job here.
I am looking for more details on how to construct the Toilet Roll Tube Copy Jig.
Where can I find a detailed tutorial?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John, thanks a lot for your prompt response!<br />
I did a great job here.<br />
I am looking for more details on how to construct the Toilet Roll Tube Copy Jig.<br />
Where can I find a detailed tutorial?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invert Colour Negatives In Lightroom by john</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/invert-colour-negative-in-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 09:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=271#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Antonio,

It sounds to me like your camera may be focusing on the background screen rather than the negative.  Because you probably don&#039;t have the option to manually focus the camera lens, you should increase your aperture opening (manually set the aperture to F8, F5 or F4) and/or move the negative away from the monitor (to try and throw the monitor out of focus). 

When  moving away from the monitor it&#039;s extra important to turn the lights off in the room and shut the window curtains to ensure that all the light received by your camera is coming from the monitor through the negative.

Thanks,

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antonio,</p>
<p>It sounds to me like your camera may be focusing on the background screen rather than the negative.  Because you probably don&#8217;t have the option to manually focus the camera lens, you should increase your aperture opening (manually set the aperture to F8, F5 or F4) and/or move the negative away from the monitor (to try and throw the monitor out of focus). </p>
<p>When  moving away from the monitor it&#8217;s extra important to turn the lights off in the room and shut the window curtains to ensure that all the light received by your camera is coming from the monitor through the negative.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera by john</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/how-to-copy-35mm-film-with-dslr-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 09:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=239#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Hey Pedro,

Yes, Please follow my link on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/invert-colour-negative-in-lightroom/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how to invert negatives&lt;/a&gt; so that you get great photos once you&#039;ve completed the copying!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Pedro,</p>
<p>Yes, Please follow my link on <a href="http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/invert-colour-negative-in-lightroom/" rel="nofollow">how to invert negatives</a> so that you get great photos once you&#8217;ve completed the copying!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How To Copy 35mm Film with DSLR Camera by Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/how-to-copy-35mm-film-with-dslr-camera/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 01:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=239#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Does this also work with negatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this also work with negatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Invert Colour Negatives In Lightroom by antoniocapelo</title>
		<link>http://www.johnamon.com/2010/08/invert-colour-negative-in-lightroom/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>antoniocapelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnamon.com/?p=271#comment-188</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;ve just tried your method, but I think it did not went very well...I used my Lumix FZ20 (not a DSLR, but it&#039;s a nice Bridge camera) and the lcd monitor as a backlight, but all the photos of the 35mm negative came out blurryish, and you could see the pixels behind the negative...do you have any idea on how can I correct this??

Thanks in advance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;ve just tried your method, but I think it did not went very well&#8230;I used my Lumix FZ20 (not a DSLR, but it&#8217;s a nice Bridge camera) and the lcd monitor as a backlight, but all the photos of the 35mm negative came out blurryish, and you could see the pixels behind the negative&#8230;do you have any idea on how can I correct this??</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

